Statutory Financial Reporting
5
Minutes Read
Published
October 5, 2025
Updated
October 5, 2025

R&D tax credit disclosure in UK statutory accounts for Biotech and Deeptech startups

Learn how to correctly present and disclose your R&D tax credits within your UK statutory accounts to ensure full HMRC compliance and accurate financial reporting.
Glencoyne Editorial Team
The Glencoyne Editorial Team is composed of former finance operators who have managed multi-million-dollar budgets at high-growth startups, including companies backed by Y Combinator. With experience reporting directly to founders and boards in both the UK and the US, we have led finance functions through fundraising rounds, licensing agreements, and periods of rapid scaling.

How to Show R&D Tax Credits in UK Company Accounts

For UK-based Biotech and Deeptech startups, the R&D tax credit is more than a rebate; it is a critical source of non-dilutive funding that extends your runway. Yet, how you show R&D tax credits in UK company accounts is not just a bookkeeping exercise. It directly impacts how investors, lenders, and auditors perceive your financial health. Incorrect R&D tax credit accounting treatment can distort key metrics like gross margin and EBITDA, creating confusion during due diligence or your annual audit. This guide provides a practical framework for founders to navigate the disclosure process correctly within their statutory accounts.

Foundational Principles of R&D Tax Credit Accounting

Reporting your R&D tax credit involves answering two fundamental questions. First, where should the credit appear on your Profit and Loss (P&L) statement? Second, in which financial year should it be booked? The answer to both lies in a key principle of UK financial reporting.

Under the prevailing standard, UK accounting standard FRS 102 treats R&D tax credits as a government grant. This classification is the starting point for all subsequent decisions. It dictates the specific rules you must follow for both presentation and timing, ensuring your statutory accounts R&D disclosure is consistent and compliant.

The Core Decision: P&L Accounting Treatment for Your R&D Tax Credit

Once you classify the credit as a government grant, FRS 102 provides two primary presentation methods for your P&L. The choice between them is an accounting policy decision you must make, apply consistently, and disclose. The reality for most pre-seed to Series B startups is more pragmatic; the choice often depends on how you want to present your operational performance to investors and the story your numbers tell.

Method 1: The Grossing-Up Method ('Above the Line')

In this method, the R&D tax credit is deducted directly from the R&D expenditure itself. This reduces your Cost of Sales or Operating Expenses, depending on where you classify R&D costs. The main impact is an increase in your gross profit and EBITDA. While this can make top-line metrics look stronger, it may also obscure the underlying cost of your innovation efforts, which can be a key point of discussion during fundraising.

For example, a preclinical biotech with £500,000 in qualifying R&D costs generates a tax credit of £150,000. Using the 'Above the Line' method, the R&D Expenditure line on the P&L would show £350,000 (£500,000 minus £150,000), resulting in a smaller operating loss.

Method 2: The Separate Income Method ('Below the Line')

With this approach, the R&D expenditure is shown in full at £500,000, and the £150,000 tax credit is presented separately as ‘Other Income’. This method keeps your gross profit and EBITDA figures untouched by the credit. It provides a clearer view of core operational performance before government incentives are factored in, which many investors prefer for its transparency.

While the profit or loss before tax is identical under both methods (£350,000 loss in our example), the journey to that number tells a different story. The core decision hinges on transparency and consistency.

Choosing a Method: Consistency and Investor Perception

While the 'Above the Line' method can make top-level metrics look stronger, the 'Below the Line' method is often favoured for its clarity. It does not mix operational results with tax incentives, allowing for a like-for-like comparison of performance year over year, independent of government support. Whichever method you choose, you must apply it consistently. Changing your accounting policy requires a compelling reason and retrospective adjustments, creating extra work and potential confusion.

Balance Sheet Impact: Creating the Asset

The P&L is only half the story. When you recognise the R&D tax credit income, you must also create a corresponding asset on your Balance Sheet. Until HMRC pays the cash into your bank account, the recognised credit sits as a ‘debtor’ or ‘receivable’ from the government.

This entry is crucial for an accurate financial picture. It correctly shows that the company is owed money, which is an asset. Once the cash is received from HMRC, the debtor is cleared, and your cash balance increases. Forgetting this step would leave your accounts unbalanced and misrepresent your company's net asset position.

Getting the Timing Right: When to Recognise the Credit

The most common mistake is waiting for cash from HMRC to hit the bank before booking the credit. The timing of recognition is governed by the accrual accounting principle, not cash receipt. This means you should recognise the credit in the same financial year that the related R&D expenditure was incurred. This matching principle is critical for accurately reflecting performance.

However, you cannot book it speculatively. The condition for recognising the credit is having 'reasonable assurance' that you will receive it and have complied with all conditions. What does ‘reasonable assurance’ mean in reality for a startup? It means you have a high degree of confidence that your claim is valid and you will receive the funds. In practice, this point is typically reached when:

  • The R&D activities for the financial year are complete.
  • The qualifying R&D costs have been identified and quantified.
  • A technical narrative is drafted, or at least substantially outlined, confirming the eligibility of the projects.

By accruing for the credit in the correct period, you avoid large, distorting swings in profitability in the following year. This prevents difficult questions from your board or auditors about why a large income amount appeared with no related activity in that period.

Statutory Accounts R&D Disclosure: Notes and Auditor Evidence

Simply placing the number on your P&L is not enough. You must also explain your process in the notes to the financial statements. This ensures transparency for anyone reading your accounts.

The Disclosure Note

A disclosure note explaining the accounting policy for the grant is required in the statutory accounts, typically in the 'Significant Accounting Policies' section. This note informs readers about the method you have chosen and how you recognise the credit. You can find further ICAEW guidance on judgements and estimates for accounting policies.

Example Disclosure Note Text:
Government Grants
The company obtains government grants in respect of its research and development expenditure. Grants are recognised in the profit and loss account on a systematic basis over the periods in which the company recognises the related costs for which the grant is intended to compensate. The R&D tax credit is recognised under the [select one: 'net basis as a reduction in the related expenditure' / 'gross basis as other operating income'] once there is reasonable assurance that the company will comply with the conditions attached to it, and the grant will be received.

Preparing for Your Audit

Beyond the note, your auditors will need to see proof. Their job is not to judge the technical merits of your R&D but to verify the amount you have booked in the accounts. To do this, auditors will typically request a file containing:

  • The detailed R&D claim calculation, showing how you arrived at the final figure.
  • The complete technical narrative submitted to HMRC.
  • The CT600 corporation tax return form where the claim was made.

Think of it as the evidence file that justifies the numbers in your P&L and balance sheet. Having this ready streamlines the audit process and demonstrates robust financial controls.

Conclusion: Key Steps for Compliant R&D Tax Reporting

Navigating R&D tax credit accounting for your UK statutory accounts boils down to a few clear steps. First, decide with your accountant whether to present the credit 'Above the Line' (reducing costs) or 'Below the Line' (as other income) and apply that policy consistently. This choice directly affects your reported gross margin and EBITDA, so consider how it presents your performance to investors.

Second, recognise the income based on the accrual principle. This means booking the credit in the year the R&D work was done, as soon as you have reasonable assurance it will be approved, not when the cash lands from HMRC. Finally, ensure your statutory accounts include a clear disclosure note explaining your chosen policy and have your supporting evidence ready for your auditors. Following these steps provides stakeholders with a clear, compliant, and accurate picture of your company's financial performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What if HMRC disputes my R&D tax claim after I've included it in my accounts?
A: If a dispute arises after you have finalised your accounts, any adjustment would typically be recognised in the current period. This is known as a change in accounting estimate. You would revise the carrying amount of the asset (the debtor) and recognise the impact in the P&L for the current year.

Q: Can I change my accounting method from 'Above the Line' to 'Below the Line'?
A: Changing an accounting policy is possible but discouraged unless a new policy results in more reliable and relevant information. It requires retrospective application, meaning you would have to restate prior year comparatives as if you had always used the new method, and fully disclose the reason for the change and its impact.

Q: Does the R&D tax credit accounting treatment differ for loss-making vs. profitable companies?
A: No, the accounting treatment under FRS 102 is the same regardless of profitability. Whether a loss-making company receives a cash credit or a profitable company receives a reduction in its tax bill, the credit is treated as a government grant. The mechanics of the tax filing differ, but the accounting principles remain constant.

Q: Where does the R&D tax credit appear besides the P&L?
A: Until the cash is received from HMRC, the R&D tax credit appears as a 'debtor' or 'receivable' on your Balance Sheet, under Current Assets. This reflects the amount owed to your company by the government. Once paid, this asset is converted into cash on the Balance Sheet.

This content shares general information to help you think through finance topics. It isn’t accounting or tax advice and it doesn’t take your circumstances into account. Please speak to a professional adviser before acting. While we aim to be accurate, Glencoyne isn’t responsible for decisions made based on this material.

Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?

We bring deep, hands-on experience across a range of technology enabled industries. Contact us to discuss.