R&D expense categorisation for UK startups: proof not just paperwork to protect runway
For UK tech startups, knowing how to categorise R&D expenses for tax credits is essential for extending your financial runway. For businesses from pre-seed to Series B, managing runway is paramount. Research and development tax credits offer a crucial, non-dilutive source of funding, but the rules can seem opaque. Founders without a dedicated finance team often face a difficult choice: claim too little and leave vital cash on the table, or claim too much and risk a time-consuming HMRC enquiry.
The core challenge is translating the daily problem-solving of your software engineers or lab scientists into a clean, defensible financial claim. This process is not merely an accounting exercise; it is about systematically capturing the value of your innovation. Getting this right provides a significant cash-flow advantage and builds a foundation of financial discipline that supports you as you scale. This guide breaks down the process. See the expense categorization hub for further tagging guidance.
Understanding Qualifying R&D: How to Categorise Expenses for UK Startup Tax Credits
Before you track a single pound of expenditure, you must understand what HMRC considers genuine research and development. The definition is specific and often narrower than the broad "R&D" term used in product roadmaps or investor updates. The official litmus test is that a project must seek an 'advance in science or technology' and resolve 'scientific or technological uncertainty', as detailed in the BEIS Guidelines.
This means you are attempting to create a new product, process, or service, or to appreciably improve an existing one. Critically, you cannot be sure that your goal is technologically possible or know how to achieve it in practice using existing knowledge. This core distinction separates qualifying R&D from routine software development or engineering. It’s the difference between inventing a new method and simply applying an established one. Confusion on this point is the most common reason startups either underclaim or have their claims challenged by HMRC.
Consider these examples across different tech sectors:
- For a SaaS Company:
- Qualifying R&D: Developing a novel machine learning algorithm that predicts customer churn with significantly higher accuracy than existing industry models. The technological uncertainty is whether a new method for processing disparate data sets can achieve the required predictive power and performance on your infrastructure.
- Non-Qualifying Activity: Building a standard login and user authentication page using well-documented frameworks like OAuth 2.0. While essential for the product, this does not resolve any technological uncertainty; it is a known process.
- For a Biotech Company:
- Qualifying R&D: Experimenting with a new combination of growth factors to create a cell-culturing medium that doubles the production yield of a therapeutic antibody. The scientific uncertainty is whether this specific combination will be stable and effective without harming the cells.
- Non-Qualifying Activity: Routine calibration of laboratory equipment or entering experimental results into a standard database. These are necessary operational tasks, not attempts to advance scientific knowledge.
- For a Deeptech or Hardware Company:
- Qualifying R&D: Designing a new type of sensor that operates at a much lower power threshold than any existing component. The technological uncertainty involves creating new material composites and electronics architecture to achieve the desired sensitivity without compromising battery life.
- Non-Qualifying Activity: Assembling a prototype using off-the-shelf components according to a known design specification. This is standard engineering, not R&D.
The Three Main Cost Buckets: Where to Find Qualifying R&D Spend
Once you have identified your qualifying R&D projects, the next step is to find the associated costs in your profit and loss statement. This is the task of figuring out where to find the qualifying spend. HMRC allows claims on specific categories of expenditure directly attributable to these R&D activities. For most tech startups, these fall into three primary buckets.
1. Staffing Costs
This is typically the largest component of an R&D claim for a tech business. The category includes the gross salaries, employer's National Insurance contributions, and employer's pension contributions for staff directly and actively engaged in the R&D project. For a CTO or senior engineer who splits their time between R&D, management, and commercial activities, you must apply a reasonable apportionment. For example, if your technical lead spends 70% of their time directly overcoming technical challenges for a new feature, you can claim 70% of their total employment costs.
2. Subcontractors and Externally Provided Workers (EPWs)
When you pay another company or individual to perform part of your R&D, these costs can often be included, but the rules are specific. Under the SME R&D Scheme, claimants can generally claim 65% of the payments made to subcontractors involved in qualifying R&D activities, as outlined in HMRC R&D SME guidance on subcontracting. A critical update for UK startups is that for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, costs for overseas subcontractors and EPWs are generally no longer claimable. This reform is designed to focus the benefits of the scheme on innovation within the UK, making it vital to assess the location of your development partners. For more details, see our contractor vs employee classification guidance.
3. Consumables and Software
This category includes the cost of materials, utilities, and software consumed or transformed in the R&D process. For a biotech company, this would include laboratory chemicals, reagents, and the power used by research equipment. For a SaaS or deeptech company, a key clarification is that costs for data and cloud computing were explicitly made eligible as qualifying expenditure for accounting periods starting on or after 1 April 2023. This covers services like AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure used for building prototypes, running simulations, training machine learning models, and testing new technology. It is important to distinguish this from general business software. A JIRA or GitHub licence used to manage the R&D project is claimable, but a CRM like Salesforce or accounting software is not.
Practical Tracking: How to Categorise R&D Expenses in Your Accounting Software
For a startup without a dedicated finance department, the idea of meticulously separating every cost can seem daunting. The key is to build a simple, sustainable system using the tools you already have. You do not need expensive, enterprise-level software to create a defensible claim; a well-configured accounting system like Xero is your best first step.
The reality for most early-stage startups is that a pragmatic approach is needed. In Xero, the most effective method is using Tracking Categories. You can implement this system in a few steps:
- Set up a Tracking Category named 'Activity' or 'Department'.
- Create options within that category, such as 'Qualifying R&D', 'Sales & Marketing', and 'General & Admin'.
- When you enter a bill from a software provider or process a payroll journal, allocate the entire cost, or split the line item, to the relevant category.
For instance, an AWS bill could be split 80% to 'Qualifying R&D' and 20% to 'General & Admin' if you use it for both developing new algorithms and running your live marketing website. This simple tagging process transforms your accounting software into a powerful R&D tracking tool. At year-end, you can run a Profit & Loss report filtered by the 'Qualifying R&D' category, which gives you a clean, pre-calculated list of your qualifying expenditure.
For tracking staff time, detailed timesheets are the gold standard but are often impractical for small, fast-moving teams. A reasonable alternative is to conduct periodic reviews with technical leads to agree on percentage allocations for key personnel. Document the basis for these estimates in meeting minutes or internal memos, referencing project roadmaps or sprint goals as evidence. You can learn more about project-based expense tracking systems in our guide.
Proof, Not Just Paperwork: Aligning Your Narrative and Your Numbers
A strong R&D tax credit claim rests on three pillars of proof: a compelling technical narrative, a clear cost calculation, and consistent supporting evidence. HMRC needs to see that your financial numbers are directly linked to the technological uncertainties you claim to be solving. Failure in aligning your narrative and your numbers is a primary trigger for enquiries and potential clawbacks.
1. The Technical Narrative
This is a short report that explains what you did. It should outline the scientific or technological baseline at the start of the project, the specific advance you were seeking, and the uncertainties you faced and overcame. For example, a narrative might state: "Our project aimed to overcome the technological uncertainty of processing real-time video streams for object detection on low-power devices. Existing libraries failed under these constraints, requiring us to develop a novel data compression algorithm to reduce latency by 70% while maintaining accuracy, representing a clear technological advance."
2. The Cost Calculation
This is the spreadsheet that connects your narrative to your finances. It should clearly list each category of cost, such as staffing, subcontractors, and software, and show how the final claimable amount was derived. For payroll, this means listing each employee involved in R&D, their total employment cost for the period (gross salary, employer's NI, and pension), the percentage of their time allocated to R&D, and the resulting qualifying R&D cost.
3. Supporting Evidence
This is the underlying data that validates your claims. It includes the tagged expenses from your Xero account, employment contracts, subcontractor invoices, and technical documentation. Artefacts like JIRA tickets, Confluence pages, or GitHub commit logs that reference the specific R&D projects are invaluable. When your JIRA board for a project aligns with the payroll costs you've claimed for the engineers working on it, you create a powerful, defensible link between the work performed and the money spent.
Key Principles for a Defensible R&D Tax Claim
Successfully categorising R&D expenses for UK tax credits does not require a complex overhaul of your operations. It begins with a clear understanding of what qualifies as R&D and is sustained by a simple, consistent tracking system. Start by applying the 'technological uncertainty' test to your projects before you begin tracking costs. Use the tools you already have, like Xero's Tracking Categories, to tag relevant costs as they occur, not months later during a year-end scramble.
Always remember to keep your technical story, your financial calculations, and your supporting evidence aligned. Finally, stay updated on crucial rule changes, particularly the UK-specific restrictions on overseas subcontractor costs and the expanded eligibility for data and cloud computing expenses. Building these habits early transforms your R&D claim from a compliance task into a strategic financial tool that can significantly extend your runway. You can learn more at the expense categorization hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I claim for R&D on a project that ultimately failed?
A: Yes. A project's success or failure is irrelevant to its eligibility for R&D tax credits. The claim is based on the intention to resolve scientific or technological uncertainty. In fact, a failed project can sometimes be strong evidence that genuine uncertainty existed and you were attempting to make a real advance.
Q: How far back can a startup make an R&D tax credit claim?
A: You can generally claim R&D tax credits for your last two completed accounting periods. The deadline for amending a company tax return to include a claim is two years after the end of the relevant accounting period. This makes it crucial to maintain good records even for past projects.
Q: Do costs for directors or founders qualify for R&D tax credits?
A: Yes, provided they are on the payroll and actively engaged in qualifying R&D activities. Just like with any other employee, you must use a reasonable apportionment to reflect the percentage of their time spent directly on R&D work versus other duties like management, fundraising, or sales.
Q: What is the main difference between the SME R&D scheme and RDEC?
A: The SME scheme is generally for small and medium-sized enterprises and is more generous, providing a larger tax relief or a payable cash credit. The Research and Development Expenditure Credit (RDEC) is for larger companies and is claimed as an above-the-line credit that is taxable income, resulting in a lower net benefit.
Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?


