Share Option Schemes
7
Minutes Read
Published
October 5, 2025
Updated
October 5, 2025

Phantom Share Schemes for UK Startups: Managing Cash Liability and Staff Incentives

Discover the key differences between phantom shares vs equity for UK startups to find the right non-dilutive incentive for your team and budget.
Glencoyne Editorial Team
The Glencoyne Editorial Team is composed of former finance operators who have managed multi-million-dollar budgets at high-growth startups, including companies backed by Y Combinator. With experience reporting directly to founders and boards in both the UK and the US, we have led finance functions through fundraising rounds, licensing agreements, and periods of rapid scaling.

Foundational Understanding: Is a Phantom Scheme Right for Your Startup?

For UK startups, particularly those from pre-seed to Series B, rewarding a growing team is a constant balancing act. You want to align everyone with the long-term vision, but traditional equity schemes like EMI have their limits. EMI schemes have a £3 million limit per company and are for UK-based employees only. This leaves a gap for incentivizing key international hires or for rewarding the team after you have outgrown the scheme. Phantom share schemes, a type of virtual share plan, offer a pragmatic solution. They provide the motivational power of equity-linked rewards without diluting existing shareholders or complicating your cap table. However, this flexibility introduces a critical trade-off: a future cash liability that must be carefully managed. Understanding this dynamic is the first step toward using these plans effectively.

At its core, a phantom share scheme is essentially a contractual cash bonus. It is not equity. Instead of granting actual shares, the company gives employees ‘units’ that mirror the value of a company share. These units vest over a period, often a standard four-year schedule with a one-year cliff, just like traditional options. The key difference is the outcome. Upon a specific liquidity event, like a company sale or an IPO, the employee receives a cash payment equal to the value of their vested units. Participants get no ownership, no voting rights, and no dividends. The payout is a cash liability on the company's books, a crucial distinction from equity-based plans.

So, when should a founder consider the trade-offs of phantom shares vs equity for UK startups? The primary triggers are clear and often arise from growth and international expansion.

  • Incentivizing International Teams: EMI schemes are exclusively for UK-based employees. When you need to hire key talent in the US or elsewhere, phantom shares provide a legally simpler way to offer an exit-based incentive without navigating complex cross-border equity laws.
  • Exceeding EMI Limits: A growing company may eventually grant up to its £3 million EMI scheme limit. Phantom shares serve as an excellent "Plan B" to continue rewarding new senior hires or providing further incentives to top performers without granting less tax-efficient unapproved options.
  • Avoiding Shareholder Dilution: Some founders are particularly sensitive to dilution. In industries like professional services or e-commerce where ownership is tightly held, these non-dilutive reward structures are preferred. They allow founders to reward a wider team but keep the cap table intact.

Structuring Your Scheme: The 3 Core Decisions

Designing a phantom stock plan in the UK that motivates staff while keeping investors comfortable requires making three core decisions upfront. The reality for most pre-Series B startups is that simplicity in structure prevents confusion and administrative headaches later. This is especially true when you are managing finances on systems like Xero or spreadsheets without a dedicated CFO. A clear, easily understood plan is a successful plan.

1. Choosing the Grant Type

Your first decision is whether to issue 'full value' or 'appreciation-only' units. This choice directly impacts the size of the final payout and how closely the employee's reward is tied to the value they help create.

Full Value Units: These are the simplest form. A full value unit pays out the entire market value of the corresponding share at the time of the liquidity event. If a share is worth £100 at exit, each vested unit pays out £100. This model is very easy to calculate and explain to employees, as it directly links their reward to the final sale price of the company. It strongly aligns employees with achieving the highest possible exit value.

Appreciation-Only Units: Also known as phantom stock appreciation rights, these units pay out only the increase in the share's value from the grant date to the liquidity event. If a share was valued at £20 on the grant date and is worth £100 at exit, each vested unit pays out £80. This model more precisely aligns employee rewards with the value created during their tenure. However, it requires tracking the grant-date value for each employee, which adds a layer of administrative complexity.

2. Defining the Valuation Method

For an early-stage startup, the valuation method should be straightforward to avoid ambiguity. The value of a phantom unit is almost always determined by the price per share paid in a true liquidity event, such as a company sale. The calculation should be simple: the total cash paid for the company divided by the total number of shares. It is wise to avoid complex formulas based on revenue multiples or interim funding round valuations. These can create disputes and misaligned expectations, as a high paper valuation from a funding round does not mean the company has the cash to make payouts.

3. Setting the Payout Triggers

Third, and most critically, you must define the payout triggers. The only trigger for a cash payout should be a genuine liquidity event where significant cash comes into the business. This generally means one of two scenarios: a change of control (an acquisition) or an Initial Public Offering (IPO). It is vital to explicitly state that a new funding round is not a liquidity event. This distinction protects the company from a scenario where it has a high valuation on paper but no actual cash to settle the phantom share liability, a situation that could easily jeopardize runway.

Managing the Cash Liability: The Million-Pound Question

Unlike equity, which dilutes ownership, phantom shares create a direct cash liability. For accounting purposes, these cash-settled awards are typically governed by IFRS 2, and similar principles apply under FRS 102 in the UK. The payout obligation is a real debt of the company that must be settled. For founders worried about cash flow, understanding how to model this is not just an accounting exercise; it is a matter of strategic financial planning that should begin long before any M&A discussions.

So, how is the payout funded? Typically, the payment is made from the proceeds of the acquisition itself. When an acquirer buys your company, the funds are first used to settle company debts and liabilities, including the phantom share liability. Only after these obligations are met are the remaining funds distributed to shareholders. This waterfall structure must be clearly defined in your scheme documents and communicated to investors so there are no surprises during a sale process.

Consider this mini-case study for a UK-based e-commerce startup:

  • Company: A Shopify-based retailer with a small, highly effective team.
  • Scheme: It grants 20,000 phantom units, representing a 4% share of the company's future value.
  • Scenario: The company is acquired for £10 million.
  • Employee Payout Pool: The total cash due to employees is 4% of £10 million, which equals £400,000.
  • Company's Total Liability: On top of this, the company has a tax obligation. UK companies must pay Employer's National Insurance Contributions (NICs), currently 13.8%, on the total payout amount. This adds another £55,200 (£400,000 * 13.8%) to the bill. The total cash required from the acquisition proceeds to settle the scheme is £455,200.

This calculation should be run in a spreadsheet and updated periodically, especially after funding rounds, to reflect a realistic range of potential exit valuations. This simple forecast helps you and your investors understand the financial impact of the scheme in various exit scenarios.

Handling HMRC Compliance (Without the Headache)

Ensuring HMRC compliance is a top concern for founders, but for phantom shares, the rules are straightforward. The key is to treat the payout exactly like a cash bonus from a tax perspective.

For the employee, the tax treatment is simple but important to understand. Phantom share payouts are subject to Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs). This is a significant difference from the tax-advantaged EMI scheme, where entrepreneurs' relief can dramatically lower the tax burden. The practical consequence is that the gross payout will be reduced by their marginal tax rate. All employee tax is handled via the company's PAYE (Pay As You Earn) system, meaning the company calculates and withholds the necessary tax and NICs before paying the net amount to the employee.

For the company, there are two primary considerations. First, as mentioned, the company is responsible for paying Employer's NICs on the full payout value. Second, there is a significant tax benefit. The full payout amount, plus the Employer's NICs paid, is typically a deductible expense against the company's Corporation Tax. This corporate tax deduction effectively lowers the net cost of the scheme to the company, softening the blow of the cash outflow during an exit.

Finally, there are administrative duties. Any non-EMI scheme, including a phantom share plan, must be registered with HMRC by a specific deadline. Furthermore, an annual return must be filed for the scheme with HMRC. This is a non-negotiable step that can be managed by an accountant or a diligent founder, ensuring everything is properly documented and compliant.

Communicating the Scheme: Making it Motivating

Structuring and managing a phantom share scheme is only half the battle. If the plan is not communicated clearly, it can create confusion and demotivation instead of alignment. This is especially true when dealing with startup employee incentives, where clarity can make the difference between a perceived benefit and a source of mistrust. The goal is to make the scheme feel tangible and valuable, even without granting actual ownership.

Clarity is key. Avoid complex financial jargon. Instead of calling it a 'synthetic equity plan', describe it as a 'cash bonus plan tied to the company's exit value'. Provide each participant with a simple, one-page summary that explains the key details. This document should state the number of units they have been granted, the vesting schedule, and, most importantly, a few simple, hypothetical examples. For instance, show what their pre-tax payout would be in a £5 million, £10 million, and £20 million exit scenario. This makes the potential reward concrete.

Setting expectations is just as critical. Be transparent from day one that the payout only occurs during a company sale or IPO, not a funding round. Explain upfront that the cash payment is treated like a bonus for tax purposes. In practice, we see that being direct about the tax implications prevents disappointment later on and builds trust. The ultimate objective is for every team member to understand how their day-to-day work contributes to a future cash outcome for themselves and the company.

Practical Takeaways

Phantom share schemes are a flexible and powerful tool in the arsenal of equity alternatives for startups. They are particularly effective for UK companies looking to reward international employees or for teams that have outgrown the financial limits of the EMI scheme. They offer a direct way to create alignment with long-term success without diluting founders and early investors.

The core decision is a strategic trade-off: you accept a future cash liability to keep your cap table intact. Success hinges on three things. First is thoughtful scheme design focused on clear triggers, simple valuation methods, and the right grant type for your goals. Second is disciplined financial forecasting in your spreadsheets to model and prepare for the cash payout. And third is transparent and consistent communication to ensure the team understands and values the incentive.

While there are HMRC registration and reporting requirements, the tax rules are clear. By treating payouts as a bonus, both companies and employees can operate with certainty. For the growing UK startup, phantom shares are a pragmatic way to ensure the entire team shares in the rewards of a successful exit. For broader background, see the share option schemes topic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can phantom shares be granted to UK employees as well as international ones?
A: Yes. While they are a popular solution for international staff who are ineligible for EMI schemes, phantom shares can be granted to any employee or contractor, regardless of location. They are often used for UK staff after a company has reached its £3 million EMI limit.

Q: What happens to an employee's vested phantom shares if they leave the company?
A: This is determined by the scheme's rules. Typically, if an employee leaves before a liquidity event, their vested units are either forfeited immediately or repurchased by the company for a nominal amount. The rules for "good leavers" and "bad leavers" should be clearly defined in the plan documents.

Q: What happens if the company never has a liquidity event like a sale or IPO?
A: In most phantom share plans, if a liquidity event does not occur, the units expire with no value and no payout is made. The scheme is designed to reward success upon a specific exit trigger. This should be communicated clearly to all participants to manage expectations.

Q: How do venture capital investors view phantom share schemes?
A: Investors are generally comfortable with well-structured phantom share plans. They appreciate that the schemes align employees with an exit without diluting the cap table. However, they will scrutinize the plan's total potential cash liability during due diligence, as it is a debt that will be paid from acquisition proceeds before shareholders.

This content shares general information to help you think through finance topics. It isn’t accounting or tax advice and it doesn’t take your circumstances into account. Please speak to a professional adviser before acting. While we aim to be accurate, Glencoyne isn’t responsible for decisions made based on this material.

Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?

We bring deep, hands-on experience across a range of technology enabled industries. Contact us to discuss.