Expense Categorization
5
Minutes Read
Published
June 30, 2025
Updated
June 30, 2025

How to Categorize Your Engineering Expenses: R&D, Maintenance, Infrastructure for Startups

Learn how to categorize engineering expenses for startups, from R&D and infrastructure to team costs, for clearer financial management and accurate budgeting.
Glencoyne Editorial Team
The Glencoyne Editorial Team is composed of former finance operators who have managed multi-million-dollar budgets at high-growth startups, including companies backed by Y Combinator. With experience reporting directly to founders and boards in both the UK and the US, we have led finance functions through fundraising rounds, licensing agreements, and periods of rapid scaling.

How to Categorize Engineering Expenses for Startups

For most early-stage tech startups, the profit and loss statement has a single, daunting line item: Engineering. It is often your largest expense, a simple number representing the cost of building your product. But treating it as one monolithic figure is a strategic blind spot. This single number hides your true burn rate, obscures the creeping cost of technical debt, and causes you to leave cash on the table through missed tax credits.

When cloud and tooling invoices are coded inconsistently in QuickBooks or Xero, it breaks automated reporting. This can delay board updates and makes it harder to produce the reliable fundraising metrics investors demand. Learning how to categorize engineering expenses for startups is not an accounting chore; it is a critical step toward financial control and operational clarity.

A Staged Approach: When to Categorize Your Engineering Spend

Why should an early-stage company categorize its engineering spend? The answer depends entirely on your stage. The level of precision you need evolves as your company grows, shifting from a nice-to-have practice to a non-negotiable requirement for financial reporting and fundraising.

Pre-Seed Stage: Focus on Survival

At the Pre-Seed stage, your primary goals are survival and speed. Your focus should be on building a minimum viable product (MVP) and finding the first signals of product-market fit. At this point, a single engineering expense bucket is usually acceptable. While it is wise to be aware of this framework, implementing it can wait until you have a more stable team and product.

Series A Stage: The Game Changes

Once you reach Series A, the game changes. Investors expect more sophisticated financial reporting and will ask detailed questions about your unit economics, gross margin, and the efficiency of your R&D investment. Without categorizing your startup engineering costs, you cannot answer these questions accurately. This is also the stage where R&D tax credits become a meaningful source of cash. A scenario we repeatedly see is that startups qualify for significant tax credits once their annual engineering spend crosses the $1 million mark, an important threshold to monitor.

Series B Stage and Beyond: A Non-Negotiable Requirement

By Series B, detailed expense categorization is mandatory. As your finance function matures, your company will likely face its first formal audit. At this point, GAAP and IFRS rules on software capitalization become enforceable. Failing to comply does not just create accounting headaches; it can delay funding rounds, trigger difficult conversations with auditors, and erode investor confidence.

The Three Jobs of Engineering: A Framework for Managing Technical Team Expenses

To effectively manage your technical team expenses, think of your engineering organization as performing three distinct jobs. Each job corresponds to a clear financial category, which simplifies how you track product development expenses and provides powerful insights into your business's health.

1. R&D ('Building the Future')

This category includes all work on new features, new products, or fundamental technological exploration that will generate future revenue. This is your investment in growth. Examples include building a new AI-powered analytics module for your SaaS platform or, for a Deeptech company, the initial discovery phase for a new compound. This work is generally considered an operating expense (OpEx) before a project is confirmed to be commercially and technologically viable.

2. Maintenance ('Maintaining the Present')

Maintenance is the work required to support your existing product and in doing so, protecting current revenue. It includes fixing bugs, patching security vulnerabilities, handling customer support escalations that require engineering time, and making minor performance tweaks. High maintenance costs can be a financial indicator of significant tech debt. If this category consumes a growing percentage of your engineering budget, it signals that past shortcuts are now demanding payback, directly reducing your capacity for innovation.

3. Infrastructure ('Powering the Platform')

These are the costs of running your live product. This bucket includes your cloud hosting bills from services like AWS or GCP, as well as monitoring and observability tools, and CI/CD services. For most SaaS startups, tech infrastructure spending is a core component of your Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). Misclassifying it as a general R&D or operating expense will artificially inflate your gross margins, giving you a dangerously misleading picture of your company's underlying profitability.

Consider a SaaS startup with a $150,000 monthly engineering payroll. As a single line item, it’s just a large cost. But categorized, you might find it’s $90,000 in R&D, $45,000 in Maintenance, and $15,000 in Infrastructure. Suddenly, you see that 30% of your team's effort is spent on tech debt, a critical insight for your next product planning session.

The Payoffs: Accurate Metrics, Cash Back, and a Healthier P&L

Properly categorizing your engineering spend delivers three powerful financial benefits. It makes you eligible for tax credits, ensures compliance with accounting standards, and provides clearer internal metrics that drive better strategic decisions.

Unlock R&D Tax Credits

Proper R&D cost allocation can unlock significant non-dilutive funding through tax credits, with different rules for UK and US startups.

  • For US companies, the R&D tax credit (under Section 174) can refund up to 10% of qualified expenses. For eligible early-stage companies, this can be used to offset payroll taxes, providing a direct reduction in your cash burn.
  • In the UK, the SME R&D tax credit scheme allows companies to claim back up to 27% of qualifying R&D spend. For pre-revenue Deeptech or biotech startups, this can be a crucial cash lifeline paid directly into the company's bank account.

Improve Profitability with Software Capitalization

Software capitalization is an accounting treatment that allows you to move certain development costs from your profit and loss statement to your balance sheet, which improves your reported profitability. Under US GAAP, IFRS, and UK GAAP (FRS 102), once a software project reaches 'technological feasibility,' subsequent coding and testing costs should be capitalized as an intangible asset. 'Technological feasibility' is generally established once you have a detailed project plan and have confirmed the technology is viable. These capitalized costs are then amortized (expensed gradually) over the software's estimated useful life. Additionally, the accounting standard ASU 2018-15 allows for the capitalization of some setup and implementation costs for cloud services.

Gain Strategic Clarity

Finally, this financial rigor provides a clear, honest view of your business. You can accurately measure your R&D investment as a percentage of revenue, track the real cost of tech debt through your software maintenance budgeting, and calculate a true gross margin by correctly allocating infrastructure costs to COGS. These are the metrics that matter most to your board, your leadership team, and future investors.

A Pragmatic Playbook: How to Categorize Engineering Expenses in an Afternoon

For founders without a dedicated finance team, implementing this system can seem daunting. The reality for most Series A startups is more pragmatic. You can get started with an 80/20 approach using tools you already have in place.

Step 1: Tag Your Work in Jira, Linear, or Another Project Tool

This is the simplest, least bureaucratic way to begin tracking this data. Create three simple labels or tags in your project management tool: R&D, Maintenance, and Infrastructure. Coach your engineering team to apply the appropriate tag to every ticket, story, or task they work on. Don't aim for perfection. If you can achieve 80% consistency, you will have a solid directional basis for your financial allocations.

Step 2: Calculate Your Quarterly Allocation Percentages

At the end of each quarter, run a report on the tickets completed. Count the number of tickets or story points associated with each category. For example, if your team completed 1,000 story points, and 600 were tagged R&D, 300 were tagged Maintenance, and 100 were tagged Infrastructure, your allocation is 60% R&D, 30% Maintenance, and 10% Infrastructure. You then apply these percentages to your total engineering payroll costs from a provider like Gusto or Rippling for the quarter.

Step 3: Update Your Accounting System

Now, you need to translate this operational data into your accounting software. Instead of one expense account for engineering payroll, you will create a more granular structure. What founders find actually works is using the built-in classification tools in their accounting platform.

  • In QuickBooks, you can use the 'Classes' feature. Create classes named R&D, Maintenance, and Infrastructure.
  • In Xero, you would use 'Tracking Categories' to achieve the same result.

At the end of the quarter, you or your bookkeeper will post a journal entry that reallocates the total engineering payroll from a single expense account into these new categories based on the percentages from Step 2. For a quarterly payroll of $450,000, you would debit $270,000 to R&D Salaries, $135,000 to Maintenance Salaries, and $45,000 to COGS-Infrastructure Salaries.

Conclusion

Learning how to categorize engineering expenses for startups is more than an exercise in compliance. It transforms a major cost center into a source of strategic insight. By moving beyond a single expense bucket, you gain a clear view of your investment in future growth, the true cost of maintaining your current product, and your platform's underlying profitability.

The tangible benefits, from substantial R&D tax credits to a healthier-looking P&L for investors, are too significant to ignore. The best part is that you can begin today without complex new software or processes. You can start by creating those three simple tags in your project management tool, a small change with significant payoffs for your company's financial future.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How granular should our project management tags be? Is 'R&D' enough?

A: For most startups through Series A, the three categories of R&D, Maintenance, and Infrastructure are sufficient. The goal is to create a simple system that engineers will actually use. Over-complicating it with too many tags can lead to inconsistent data. Start simple to build the habit first.

Q: How should we allocate the salaries of engineering managers or VPs?

A: The standard practice is to allocate the salaries of managers and other shared engineering resources on a pro-rata basis. If their team's work for the quarter was 60% R&D, 30% Maintenance, and 10% Infrastructure, the manager's salary and associated payroll costs would be allocated using the same 60/30/10 split.

Q: What if my engineers see this as unnecessary accounting bureaucracy?

A: Frame it as a strategic tool, not an accounting chore. Explain how this process directly funds future projects by unlocking R&D tax credits. Show them how tracking maintenance costs helps make the case for dedicated sprints to address tech debt, which often improves their own day-to-day work experience.

Q: Can we retroactively claim R&D tax credits if we haven't been categorizing expenses?

A: In both the US and UK, it is often possible to make a retroactive claim, but it requires a detailed retrospective analysis of past projects, calendars, and payroll records. This process is generally more complex, time-consuming, and expensive than tracking the data contemporaneously. It is best to consult a tax specialist.

This content shares general information to help you think through finance topics. It isn’t accounting or tax advice and it doesn’t take your circumstances into account. Please speak to a professional adviser before acting. While we aim to be accurate, Glencoyne isn’t responsible for decisions made based on this material.

Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?

We bring deep, hands-on experience across a range of technology enabled industries. Contact us to discuss.