Cap Table Basics
5
Minutes Read
Published
July 24, 2025
Updated
July 24, 2025

Cap table software comparison: Carta vs alternatives to manage dilution and compliance

Choosing the best cap table software for startups? Our comparison of Carta and its top alternatives helps you find the right equity management tool for your company's needs.
Glencoyne Editorial Team
The Glencoyne Editorial Team is composed of former finance operators who have managed multi-million-dollar budgets at high-growth startups, including companies backed by Y Combinator. With experience reporting directly to founders and boards in both the UK and the US, we have led finance functions through fundraising rounds, licensing agreements, and periods of rapid scaling.

The Best Cap Table Software for Startups: A Founder's Guide

For an early-stage founder, the capitalization table, or cap table, often begins as a simple spreadsheet. It lists who owns what part of your company. But as you grow, issuing post-money SAFEs, granting employee options, and raising a convertible note, that simple sheet quickly becomes a source of anxiety. The risk of an error that miscalculates dilution or ownership percentages is high, and the stakes only get higher with each funding round. Choosing the best cap table software for startups is not just an administrative upgrade; it is a foundational step for managing equity with confidence. These digital cap table solutions provide a single source of truth, automating complex calculations and preparing you for the scrutiny of investor due diligence.

The Tipping Point: When a Spreadsheet Becomes a Liability

The move from a spreadsheet to dedicated equity software for startups is not a matter of if, but when. Nearly every pre-seed company reaches a point where a manual cap table becomes a significant risk. This typically happens when raising a first significant seed round of $1M or more. At this stage, you are no longer just tracking founder shares. You are modeling how multiple investment instruments, like convertible notes and post-money SAFEs, convert into equity during a priced round.

A spreadsheet requires manual, error-prone calculations to model dilution for every existing shareholder. A single formula error can lead to costly legal corrections and damage investor confidence during due diligence. This is where the concept of a ‘Single Source of Truth’ becomes essential for startup ownership tracking. Equity management tools ensure that what founders, investors, and employees see is identical and accurate. This eliminates version control issues and provides a clear, dynamic view of your company’s ownership structure.

Carta: The Market Leader and Its Tradeoffs

Carta has firmly established itself as the market leader in cap table management, particularly within US-centric startup ecosystems like Y-Combinator. For a US C-Corp, it is often the default choice for a reason. Its platform is a comprehensive ecosystem that handles everything from share issuance and cap table management to critical compliance requirements like 409A valuations.

The All-in-One Ecosystem

A 409A valuation is a formal appraisal of a private company’s stock, required by the IRS to determine the fair market value for issuing stock options under an Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP). Carta's ability to manage these valuations and administer ESOPs makes it a powerful, all-in-one solution for equity management. It centralizes tasks that would otherwise require coordination between lawyers, accountants, and valuation experts, saving significant time for scaling companies.

Considerations for Early-Stage Startups

However, this comprehensive nature comes with drawbacks, especially for pre-seed and seed-stage companies. The subscription cost can be significant for a lean budget. Furthermore, the platform's complexity can be overwhelming for a founder-led team with no dedicated CFO. The total cost of ownership, which includes the time your team spends learning and operating the system, must be considered. The reality for most early startups is more pragmatic: they need a tool that solves their immediate problems without a hefty price tag or a steep learning curve.

The Challengers: Comparing Carta Alternatives Like Pulley and Ledgy

The market has responded with strong challengers that address the pain points of cost and complexity, creating a robust shareholding platform comparison. These alternatives typically focus on specific geographies or a more streamlined user experience, making them excellent digital cap table solutions for certain types of companies.

Pulley: The US-Focused Competitor

Pulley has gained significant traction as a strong US-based alternative to Carta. It focuses on speed and simplicity, offering a cleaner interface and faster onboarding process. This directly appeals to founders who find Carta’s ecosystem too cumbersome for their early-stage needs. Pulley handles the core jobs of cap table management and 409A valuations effectively for US C-Corps, positioning itself as a more accessible and founder-friendly option.

Ledgy: The International and UK Specialist

For companies based outside the United States, the considerations change significantly. A scenario we repeatedly see is an international company choosing a platform like Ledgy. Consider a UK-based SaaS company that needs to manage its UK-specific Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme, which offers tax-advantaged options for employees. They may also have European investors and need to handle multi-currency grants. For them, a platform like Ledgy is built for this reality. It directly integrates with UK compliance needs, like filings for Companies House, and facilitates valuations approved by HMRC for the EMI scheme. A more US-centric tool might handle these regional requirements less smoothly, making Ledgy the superior choice for many UK and European businesses.

Head-to-Head: Solving the Core Pains of Founder Equity Management

When comparing platforms, it comes down to how they solve the core anxieties around equity. Founders are typically worried about three things: calculation errors, compliance missteps, and a painful migration process.

1. The Risk of Inaccurate Dilution Modeling

The primary fear is a simple math error with massive consequences. Manually modeling how multiple SAFEs or convertible notes impact founder and investor ownership is complex and stressful. Equity management tools remove this burden.

A manual spreadsheet requires you to calculate each post-money SAFE’s conversion individually, adjusting the company capitalization at each step. Software automates this: you input the SAFE terms (e.g., $200k on a $10M post-money cap), and the platform instantly models the resulting ownership percentage, showing pro-forma dilution for all existing stakeholders after the full round closes.

2. The Uncertainty Around Compliance (US vs. UK)

Compliance is where the geographic distinction is most critical. For US companies, the main concern is obtaining a compliant 409A valuation to price stock options legally. Both Carta and Pulley excel here. For UK and European companies, the focus shifts to managing tax-advantaged plans like the EMI scheme and handling regular Companies House filings. What founders find actually works is choosing a platform designed for their specific regulatory environment, which is why Ledgy often becomes the more natural fit for businesses in the UK.

3. The Migration and Integration Process

The final pain point is the migration process itself. While platforms offer support, the integrity of your initial spreadsheet is paramount. Before migrating, ensure all data is clean, complete, and accurate. Once established, this new single source of truth pays dividends when you sync it with other business systems. Integrating your cap table with payroll for option grants (e.g., Gusto, Rippling) and accounting software (e.g., QuickBooks in the US, Xero in the UK) saves time and ensures accuracy when managing investor shares and employee equity.

How to Choose the Best Cap Table Software for Your Startup

Choosing the right equity management tools depends entirely on your company’s stage, location, and complexity. For most pre-seed companies, a meticulously maintained spreadsheet can suffice in the very early days. The tipping point is clear: upon raising a seed round of $1M or more, the risks of manual startup ownership tracking generally outweigh the cost of software. For more on this, see our dilution modeling guide for multi-round forecasting.

Your decision can be guided by a few simple rules:

  • For US C-Corps, particularly those in established accelerator ecosystems, Carta remains the comprehensive standard. Pulley is a strong, streamlined, and often more affordable alternative worth serious consideration.
  • For UK and international startups, Ledgy’s focus on local compliance, including EMI schemes, multi-currency support, and HMRC requirements, often makes it the more practical and efficient choice.
  • For very early, pre-funding startups, focus on building a clean, accurate spreadsheet first. This discipline will make any future migration to a dedicated platform far smoother. Explore our cap table basics hub for practical guides.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How much does cap table software typically cost for an early-stage startup?
A: Costs vary widely. Some platforms offer free tiers for very small companies (fewer than 25 stakeholders). Paid plans typically start from a few hundred dollars per month and increase based on the number of stakeholders and features like 409A valuations, which can add a few thousand dollars per year.

Q: Can I migrate from a spreadsheet to a platform like Carta or Pulley later?
A: Yes, all major platforms are designed to help you migrate from a spreadsheet. However, the process is much smoother if your spreadsheet is accurate and well-organized. It is wise to have a lawyer or finance professional review your spreadsheet cap table before beginning the migration to avoid costly errors.

Q: Do I need a 409A valuation if my company is not based in the US?
A: A 409A valuation is a specific requirement of the US Internal Revenue Code (IRC). If you are a non-US company with no US employees receiving stock options, you generally do not need one. However, UK companies granting EMI options will need a valuation approved by HMRC, which serves a similar purpose.

Q: What is an EMI scheme and why is it important for UK startups?
A: The Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) is a UK government scheme that allows smaller, high-growth companies to grant tax-advantaged stock options to employees. It is a powerful tool for attracting and retaining talent, as it offers significant tax benefits to employees upon selling their shares, making it a key compliance area for UK-based equity management.

This content shares general information to help you think through finance topics. It isn’t accounting or tax advice and it doesn’t take your circumstances into account. Please speak to a professional adviser before acting. While we aim to be accurate, Glencoyne isn’t responsible for decisions made based on this material.

Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?

We bring deep, hands-on experience across a range of technology enabled industries. Contact us to discuss.