IP Licensing & Collaboration Revenue
6
Minutes Read
Published
August 1, 2025
Updated
August 1, 2025

ASC 606 Revenue Recognition for Biotech Startups: Accounting for IP Licensing, Milestones, Royalties

Glencoyne Editorial Team
The Glencoyne Editorial Team is composed of former finance operators who have managed multi-million-dollar budgets at high-growth startups, including companies backed by Y Combinator. With experience reporting directly to founders and boards in both the UK and the US, we have led finance functions through fundraising rounds, licensing agreements, and periods of rapid scaling.

ASC 606 IP Licensing Revenue for US Biotech Startups

For a US-based biotech startup, signing your first major intellectual property (IP) licensing deal is a monumental achievement. The upfront cash provides critical runway, and the partnership validates years of intense R&D. But as the wire transfer hits your bank account, a complex question emerges that most founder-scientists are not prepared for: how do you actually account for this money?

The answer is governed by a dense accounting standard, ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. For US biotech startups operating under US GAAP, getting this wrong is not a minor bookkeeping error. It can lead to painful audit adjustments, damage investor confidence, and create a distorted picture of your company’s financial health. This is a high-stakes issue because the distinction between cash received and revenue earned is fundamental. Recognizing millions of dollars upfront when it should be spread over several years can inflate performance in the short term, only to create a revenue cliff later. This guide provides a practical framework for biotech founders to navigate biotech startup revenue recognition for licensing deals, ensuring your financial reporting is as rigorous as your science.

The First, Most Important Question: Is Your License a Product or a Promise?

Under ASC 606, everything starts with identifying your “performance obligations,” which are the distinct promises you’ve made to your partner. Figuring out whether your IP license and any bundled R&D services are distinct performance obligations is the first challenge you will face. The core question is whether you are handing over a finished product (the IP as it exists today) or promising ongoing access and support that will shape the IP’s value over time.

This is the critical distinction between a 'Right-to-Use' license and a 'Right-to-Access' license. A Right-to-Use license grants the customer rights to the IP as it exists at the moment of the grant. The value is static, and your work is done. Revenue is typically recognized at a single point in time. In contrast, a Right-to-Access license involves your ongoing activities significantly affecting the IP’s value for the customer. The customer benefits from your continued efforts, R&D, and support. For these, revenue is recognized over the period you are providing that access and support.

In the world of early-stage biotech licensing agreements accounting, the vast majority of deals are Right-to-Access. Your partner is not just buying your patent; they are buying your expertise and your commitment to advancing the underlying science, making the license and services a single, combined performance obligation. Let’s consider a common scenario to illustrate this.

Case Study: GeneCo and Big Pharma

Imagine GeneCo, a preclinical biotech startup, signs a deal with Big Pharma. The terms are:

  • Upfront Fee: $5M
  • R&D Collaboration Period: 3 years, during which GeneCo will perform specific research activities.
  • IND Filing Milestone: $10M
  • Phase 3 Start Milestone: $50M
  • Royalty Rate: 5% on net sales

Here, the IP license for GeneCo’s discovery-stage compound is inseparable from the 3-year R&D collaboration. Big Pharma is paying for GeneCo's continued involvement to advance the compound. The value of the license is intrinsically tied to the future success of the R&D program. Therefore, the license and the R&D services are not distinct. They are a single, combined performance obligation: a promise to provide access to developing IP and related research services over the next three years. This is a crucial determination. It means the entire transaction, including the upfront fee, must be viewed through the lens of that 3-year service period. The reality for most biotech startups is more pragmatic: your partner is licensing your team's brainpower as much as the IP itself, making it a single performance obligation delivered over time.

Decoding Your Deal's Economics: A Practical Guide to Each Revenue Stream

Once you've established that your deal is a single performance obligation delivered over time, the next step is to determine the correct accounting treatment for each component: the upfront fee, the milestones, and the royalties. A common mistake is to confuse the cash received with the revenue earned. ASC 606 compliance for biotech demands a clear separation.

1. The Upfront Fee: Deferred Revenue, Not Immediate Income

GeneCo received $5M cash upfront. It’s tempting to book this as revenue immediately, but that would be incorrect. Since the performance obligation (the bundled R&D and license access) is delivered over three years, the upfront fee revenue must also be recognized over that same period. When the cash arrives, it goes on your balance sheet as 'Deferred Revenue' or 'Contract Liability'. This is money you’ve been paid for a service you have not yet fully delivered.

Then, you recognize it methodically. The most common approach is a straight-line method. Here is the accounting logic:

  • Total Upfront Fee: $5,000,000
  • Service Period: 3 years (36 months)
  • Monthly Revenue Recognition: $5,000,000 / 36 = $138,889 per month

For three years, your income statement (P&L) will show $138,889 in upfront fee revenue biotech each month. Simultaneously, your balance sheet liability for Deferred Revenue will decrease by that same amount. This approach accurately reflects the ongoing nature of your promise to Big Pharma.

2. Milestones: Recognizing Variable Consideration

Milestones, like the $10M for IND filing and $50M for starting Phase 3, are defined as 'variable consideration'. The amounts are not guaranteed. The core principle of ASC 606 states that variable consideration is recognized only when it is 'probable' that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. In the unpredictable world of drug development, the probability of hitting a scientific milestone is highly uncertain until it is actually achieved.

Therefore, for R&D-based milestones, you do not estimate or recognize any revenue until the event itself occurs. This is the correct method for milestone payment recognition. Using the GeneCo example, the $10M IND filing milestone is not recognized until the IND is successfully filed. At that point, and only at that point, you can recognize the full $10M as revenue. You don't try to guess the odds or book it early. This is a conservative approach mandated by the standard to prevent overstating revenue based on uncertain future events. For additional context, see guidance from large-firm practice on pharma revenue recognition.

3. Royalties: The Sales-Based Exception

Royalty revenue US GAAP has its own special rule. ASC 606 provides a specific exception for sales- or usage-based royalties on licenses of intellectual property. This rule simplifies things greatly. The guidance states that revenue is recognized at the later of when the subsequent sale or usage occurs, or the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied. For a biotech startup, this effectively means you recognize royalty revenue when your partner makes the end sales.

For GeneCo, this means you do not estimate future sales. You wait for Big Pharma to sell the approved drug. If Big Pharma reports $200M in net sales in a quarter, GeneCo recognizes its 5% royalty, or $10M, as revenue for that quarter. The contract's reporting timeline is key here. If the deal states the partner must provide sales data within 30 days of quarter-end, you will book the revenue in the quarter the sales occurred, even if you receive the cash later. This requires a robust process for tracking partner data to avoid misstating revenue. For practical implementation guidance, see the royalty revenue guide.

The Biotech Founder's ASC 606 Playbook: A Simplified 5-Step Framework

While the concepts can feel complex, they map directly to the official 5-step model for revenue recognition under ASC 606. Understanding how your deal terms fit this framework is essential for explaining your accounting policies to auditors and investors.

Let’s walk through the GeneCo deal using this formal structure:

  1. Identify the contract with a customer. This is the easiest step: it is the fully executed licensing and collaboration agreement signed between GeneCo and Big Pharma.
  2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract. As we determined, the IP license and the multi-year R&D services are highly interrelated and not distinct. Therefore, they are combined into a single, bundled performance obligation. This is the most critical judgment a biotech company has to make.
  3. Determine the transaction price. The transaction price includes all the compensation you expect to be entitled to. This consists of the fixed amount (the $5M upfront fee) plus an estimate of the variable consideration (the milestones). However, because the R&D milestones are constrained until achieved, they are effectively valued at $0 for initial accounting purposes until the event occurs. Royalties are excluded from this initial calculation due to the specific royalty exception.
  4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations. This step is simple when you have only one performance obligation. The entire transaction price, starting with the $5M upfront payment, is allocated to that single bundle of license and R&D services.
  5. Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. This is where the timing comes into play. Since the single performance obligation is satisfied over the 3-year R&D period, GeneCo recognizes the $5M upfront fee revenue on a straight-line basis over those 36 months. As milestones are achieved, their value is added to the transaction price and recognized as revenue immediately. Royalties are recognized as sales occur.

This structured approach provides the logic and documentation trail that auditors expect to see regarding your revenue recognition policies.

Practical Takeaways for Your Startup

A scenario we repeatedly see is founders booking cash as revenue, creating a major cleanup project before a due diligence process. Knowing the theory is one thing; implementing it is another. A simple, disciplined process can prevent misstating revenue and improve cash-flow forecasts. You can use tools like QuickBooks' revenue recognition schedule feature to help automate this. See our QuickBooks how-to for licensing deals.

Here are the most immediate, actionable steps to take after signing a licensing deal:

1. Set Up Your Chart of Accounts Correctly in QuickBooks.

You will need a few specific accounts:

  • Balance Sheet Account (Current Liability): Deferred Revenue or Contract Liabilities. This is where the upfront cash payment is initially recorded.
  • Income Statement Account (Income): Licensing Revenue - Upfront. This is where you will recognize the monthly portion of the upfront fee.
  • Income Statement Account (Income): Licensing Revenue - Milestones. Use this to record milestone payments when they are achieved.
  • Income Statement Account (Income): Licensing Revenue - Royalties. Use this for royalty revenue once sales begin.

2. Create a Deferred Revenue Schedule.

This is your source of truth for recognizing the upfront fee. It can be a simple spreadsheet. Auditors will ask for it.

Example Deferred Revenue Schedule

Month | Beginning Balance | Monthly Revenue Recognized | Ending Balance

Jan 2024 | $5,000,000 | ($138,889) | $4,861,111

Feb 2024 | $4,861,111 | ($138,889) | $4,722,222

Mar 2024 | $4,722,222 | ($138,889) | $4,583,333

... | ... | ... | ...

Dec 2026 | $138,889 | ($138,889) | $0

Each month, you will make a journal entry in your accounting software to move $138,889 from the Deferred Revenue liability account to the Licensing Revenue income account.

3. Maintain a Milestone and Royalty Tracker.

This log documents the status of all variable consideration. It is crucial for financial forecasting and for auditors.

Example Milestone Tracker Log

Milestone Description | Contract Value | Probability Assessment | Expected Timing | Status | Revenue Recognized

IND Filing | $10,000,000 | Constrained until met | Q4 2025 | In Progress | $0

Phase 3 Start | $50,000,000 | Constrained until met | Q2 2028 | Not Started | $0

5% Royalty on Sales | N/A | Sales-based exception | Post-approval | Not Applicable | $0

This disciplined tracking ensures you have a clear rationale for when and why revenue is recognized, making your financial statements auditable and reliable for investors. Proper biotech licensing accounting is not just a compliance exercise; it is a pillar of financial discipline that builds a sustainable foundation for your startup's growth.

For related deep dives, see the topic hub on IP Licensing & Collaboration Revenue.

This content shares general information to help you think through finance topics. It isn’t accounting or tax advice and it doesn’t take your circumstances into account. Please speak to a professional adviser before acting. While we aim to be accurate, Glencoyne isn’t responsible for decisions made based on this material.

Curious How We Support Startups Like Yours?

We bring deep, hands-on experience across a range of technology enabled industries. Contact us to discuss.